There are four main hollow Earth models. Lets briefly discuss each one.
Hollow Earth Models
- The Concentric Spheres Hollow Earth Model
- The Polar Holes Hollow Earth Model
- The Inverted Earth Hollow Earth Model
- The Complete Shell Hollow Earth Model
The Concentric Spheres Hollow Earth Model
Perhaps the earliest hollow Earth concept was proposed by Edmund Halley in 1692. His ideas were developed while trying to understand the Earth's magnetic field. In order to explain the complex movements of the field, Halley concluded that there must be at least 4 concentric shells each with their own magnetic properties. The movement of each shell relative to the others allowed distinctive areas of the field to wander around the globe.
The Polar Holes Hollow Earth Model
The most famous hollow Earth model includes huge polar holes between 2000 and 4000 kilometres across that open to the interior of the planet. Many hollow Earth investigators have gone looking for these holes but nothing has ever been found. Today's satellite technology has proven that such holes are a total myth. In this theory the centre of the planet harbours a central sun that provides light and heat to the world within.
The Inverted Earth Hollow Earth Model
This little known concept is the most bizarre of hollow Earth ideas. It works on the principle that we are actually living inside a hollow planet right now and the centre of the planet is a point infinitely far away. All the other planets, the moon, satellites and the sun revolve around this central point.
The Complete Shell Hollow Earth Model
Developed by us, this is the most advanced hollow Earth model today. Based on a combination of the hollow Earth and expanding Earth theories, it provides an alternate explanation for the drifting continents phenomenon thus making the tired Plate Tectonics theory obsolete.
Based on our current understanding of gravity The Land of No Horizon shows how the accumulation of matter during the planet forming process naturally produces a planet structured differently to what is currently theorised. It is also shown how a planet hollows out and expands under its own gravitational power.
The hollow planet structure can explain many mysteries that have plagued us for centuries such as unusual Impact crater characteristics on terrestrial planets, the mysterious Red Spot on Jupiter and seismic wave data from earthquakes here on Earth. Understanding outgassing and atmosphere formation on a hollow planet model helps us explain past mysteries such as the great flood on Earth and the Floods on Mars.
An expanding Earth provides the driving force behind the drifting continents, mountain building and earthquakes and is also accountable for changing the value of gravity over time. In the past when the Earth was smaller centrifugal force from a much faster speed of rotation reduced the affects of gravity in equatorial regions. This reduction of gravity is what allowed the great dinosaurs and all past life to grow to much larger sizes.
The land of No Horizon Book investigates all these areas in great detail explaining at length how all these processes work together. You will be suprised just how viable the Hollow Earth theory has become.
2 comments:
please I want to know how to explain
this:
the average density of the earth is 5,515.3 kg/m³ (I saw it in Wikipedia) but the surface average density is less than that (I think is about 3 kg/m³). So de center must be much heavier, (they say is iron) but:
if the earth is hollow, the average density of the shield must be about 17 (I calculated it). so the inside of this shield must be much heavier, much than iron.
Could it be gold or platinum or some other heavier metal.????
Hi Franklin, The only true measure of the strength of gravity is with the Cavendish experiment, the reason is because you know exactly how much matter make up the two masses. The problem however is that this experiment is extremely inaccurate because the measured force is very small. The end result of these experiments is the value of the Gravitation Constant and this constant is one of the most inaccurate:
The accuracy of the measured value of {G} \ has increased only modestly since the original experiment of Cavendish. {G} \ is quite difficult to measure, as gravity is much weaker than other fundamental forces, and an experimental apparatus cannot be separated from the gravitational influence of other bodies. Furthermore, gravity has no established relation to other fundamental forces, so it does not appear possible to measure it indirectly. A recent review (Gillies, 1997) shows that published values of {G} \ have varied rather broadly, and some recent measurements of high precision are, in fact, mutually exclusive.
When we take these results and scale them up to the size of a planet our experimental errors are scaled up by a multiplying factor. We hope to prove with out book that the Earth does not have as much mass as calculated. All other planets are hollow and have proportionally less mass, and when we consider that there is actually much less mass out in the cosmos we can explain the dark matter problem discovered from the rotation of stars in galaxy's.
Post a Comment